An Autoethnographic Exploration of Design Justice as a Framework for Anti-Racist, Equitable Curriculum Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/27598Keywords:
Social Work, Higher Education, Curriculum Design, Adult LearnersAbstract
As higher education contends with the complexity of providing a more diverse and equitable education for students, we believe that social workers should lead this movement. This case study's purpose is to share the experiences of social work educators engaging in a justice-centered practice guiding curriculum development. In addition, we hope to inspire other faculty to consider implementing similar practices within their curriculum. The following study presents the experiences of four faculty and staff members at an urban-centered, generalist practice social work department in higher education. Using an autoethnographic model, we engaged in an in-depth exploration of our own educational experiences, uncovering our own biases, and working towards more progressive and equitable models of education. We learned new ways of sharing content, grading, and accepting the expertise of others. There are important implications of this work, such that design justice can increase students’ engagement, sense of belonging, and ultimately degree completion.
References
Almeida, R. V., Werkmeister Rozas, L. M., Cross-Denny, B., Lee, K. K., & Yamada, A. M. (2019). Coloniality and intersectionality in social work education and practice. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 30(2), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2019.1574195
Al-Haija, Y. A., & Mahamid, H. (2021). Trends in higher education under neoliberalism: Between traditional education and the culture of globalization. Educational Research and Reviews, 16(2), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2020.4101
Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., & Bloom, B. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed.). Longman.
Armstrong, T. (2018). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (4th ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Branson, R., Rayner, G., Cox, J., Furman, J., King, F., & Hannum, W. (1975). Interservice procedures for instructional systems development: Technical level workshop. U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA023892
Clarke, S. N., Sushil, S., Dennis, K., Lee, U., Gomol, A., & Gates, Z. (2023). Developing shared ways of seeing data: The perils and possibilities of achieving intercoder agreement. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231160973
Connor, D. (2022). Anti-oppression curriculum initiative. UCSF Medical Education. https://meded.ucsf.edu/current-students/anti-oppression-curriculum-initiative
Costanza-Chock, S. (2018). Design justice: Towards an intersectional feminist framework for design theory and practice. Proceedings of the Design Research Society. In C. Storni, K. Leahy, M. McMahon, P. Lloyd, & E. Bohemia (Eds.), Design as a catalyst for change - DRS International Conference 2018 (pp. 529-540). Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.679
Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/43542/external_content.pdf
Cottrell, R., & Obermann, A. (2025). Collaborative online course design. In J. T. Howard, E. Romero Hall, C. Daniel, L. Newman, & N. Bond (Eds.), Feminist pedagogy for teaching online. Athabasca University Press.
Council on Social Work Education. (2022). 2022 EPAS educational policy and accreditation standards. Author. https://www.cswe.org/accreditation/policies-process/2022epas/
Czerkawski, B., & Lyman, E. (2016). An instructional design framework for fostering student engagement in online learning environments. TechTrends, 60(6), 532-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z
Daftry, A., & Sugrue, E. (2022). “It’s David versus Goliath:” Anti-oppressive practice in K-12 education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 55(1-2), 148-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2021.2010014
Design Justice Network. (2018). Design justice network principles. Author. https://designjustice.org/read-the-principles
Fook, J. (2014). Learning from and researching (my own) experience: A critical reflection on the experience of social difference. In S. Witkin (Ed.), Narrating social work through autoethnography (pp. 120-140). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/witk15880-006
Fook, J. (Ed.). (2022). Practicing critical reflection in social care organizations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429351501
Galloway, M. K., Callin, P., James, S., Vimegnon, H., & McCall, L. (2019). Culturally responsive, antiracist, or anti-oppressive? How language matters for school change efforts. Equity & Excellence in Education, 52(4), 485-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2019.1691959
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. Basic Books/Hachette Book Group.
Goff, L., & Knorr, K. (2018). Three heads are better than one: Students, faculty, and educational developers as co-developers of science curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3333
Hart, J. (2018). Importance of instructional designers in online higher education. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 2018, 101-107. https://doi.org/10.51869/92jeh
Kallenbach, S., & Viens, J. (Eds.). (2001). Multiple intelligences in practice: Teacher research reports from the adult multiple intelligences study. National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy [NCSALL] & Harvard Project Zero and New England Literacy Resource Center/ World Education. https://publications.worlded.org/WEIInternet/inc/common/_download_pub.cfm?id=16687&lid=3
Luke, A. (2013). Introduction: The practical problem of curriculum making. In A. Luke, A. Woods, K. & Weir, (Eds.), Curriculum, syllabus design, and equity: A primer and model. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203833452
Morris, S. M. (2018). Critical instructional design. In S. M. Morris & J. Stommel (Eds.), An urgency of teachers: The work of critical digital pedagogy (eBook, Learning Online sec.). Pressbooks. https://pressbooks.pub/criticaldigitalpedagogy/front-matter/acknowledgements/
Mercer-Mapstone, M., Dvorakova, S., Matthews, K., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Fetlend, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 15-37. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Moore, S. L. (2021). The design models we have are not the design models we need. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(4), 13-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.51869/104/smo
National Association of Social Workers [NASW]. (2021). National Association of Social Workers code of ethics. Author. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage.
Quality Matters. (2025). About QM. Author. https://www.qualitymatters.org/why-quality-matters/about-qm
Zinga, D., & Styres, S. (2019). Decolonizing curriculum: Student resistances to anti-oppressive pedagogy. Power and Education, 11(1), 30-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757743818810565
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Erin Boyce, Julie Clockston, Ann Sullivan, Rebecca Cottrell

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.